Started By
Message

re: Why so much emphasis on space when 95% of our oceans remain unexplored?

Posted on 12/17/16 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 4:50 pm to
Dude the oceans are huge, if we wasted time trying to search every nook and cranny we'd never finish. Space is much more manageable, size-wise.
Posted by Dr Dawg
Toccoa, Ga
Member since Feb 2011
283 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Dude the oceans are huge, if we wasted time trying to search every nook and cranny we'd never finish. Space is much more manageable, size-wise.


Not sure if serious.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Dude the oceans are huge, if we wasted time trying to search every nook and cranny we'd never finish. Space is much more manageable, size-wise.


1. no. space is bigger, by orders of magnitude beyond comprehension.
yes the ocean floors are so deep that we have not been down there, but we have our doubts about any sentient beings living down there, no cultures. all there is is mining and learning about the planet. space holds space brothers, and mining without the pressure of all that water. we have the technology to mine on the Moon, right now. we will tear it up like West Virginia.


2. the payoff is bigger long term if we develop the capacities required for travel to far planets. e g we might be able to run from earth after we make it uninhabitable.
it might be that it takes us eons to develop everything necessary to travel millions of light years. it might require generations to live in space.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram