- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What punishment is fair for unfaithful electors
Posted on 12/5/16 at 10:51 pm to DBest
Posted on 12/5/16 at 10:51 pm to DBest
quote:
I dont see a difference in either candidate not being qualified to lead this US. You pointed out HRC flaws which are valid but you leave out Trumps. And even if he had no personality flaws (which he does have many) he has no experience. You voted for someone to lead this great nation who hasnt proven the ability to run this country...period. In my book, you have to be qualified to get the job
There are qualifications that are required to be met before you can run. If you don't like those work to have them changed but don't subvert the election process because you don't like the winning candidate.
1
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:23 pm to bencoleman
quote:Well this is part of the election process too, but there is a reason there had been only one instance of this actually impacting the election (1836).
but don't subvert the election process because you don't like the winning candidate.
In addition, the Supreme Court has ruled that binding electors is allowed so states can choose that option too. If they don't choose that then we must accept the process, flaws and all right?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News