Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:17 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99877 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:17 am to
Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary



Source?
Posted by YellowShoe
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2006
1381 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Very few will be against it

Lot's of folks are against it for various reasons.
- its a hassle crossing the wall to reach their land
- there are plenty of golf courses on the other side of the wall
- some ranches are 30 mins to hour away, when they were 5 minutes away
- wall may have to be built miles inland in some instances
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98754 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary


Some of the land won't have a clear title, and that will have to be unsnarled. Some landowners will think the government isn't offering enough. Some landowners may be against it because it cuts off access to their source of irrigation water. Some property will be owned by contentious heirs who can't agree on anything. Some landowners will be against it out of sheer contrariness.

Trump will be long out of office and they will still be working on land acquisition.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram