- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:49 am to DelU249
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:49 am to DelU249
Agreed you can't just look at the current vote totals and think that would happen if the method was the popular vote.
In fact, we have no idea who doesnt vote now because they feel it's pointless. It would be the same situation in states like LA and TX as it would be in NYC and Chicago.
In fact, we have no idea who doesnt vote now because they feel it's pointless. It would be the same situation in states like LA and TX as it would be in NYC and Chicago.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 11:32 am to SportTiger1
quote:
Agreed you can't just look at the current vote totals and think that would happen if the method was the popular vote.
In fact, we have no idea who doesnt vote now because they feel it's pointless. It would be the same situation in states like LA and TX as it would be in NYC and Chicago.
Not to mention that candidates would campaign differently. I don think Trump or Hillary spent any time in CA because they knew which way it was going. Given the large population they would have both spent a considerable amount of time there under a popular vote system and much less time in some other state.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)