- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Start an Investigation
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
The difference was explained.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
2
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:46 am to KLSU
quote:I could actually buy this logic, but the announcers at the time said it was officially called not targeting because the Bama player didn't lead with the crown, which of course he clearly did. So if that was the official reason, then there is definitely a problem.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless"
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:10 am to KLSU
quote:
The difference was explained. The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
According to the rules, being defenseless has nothing to do with it if you lead with the crown of the helmet. The Bama player did lead with the crown of the helmet. The fact that it was not called on the field is understandable. However, The fact that the replay booth did not take a look at it speaks volumes.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News