A running back taking a direct snap is not "wildcat". Les would stick Ware and LF at qb and run power run plays. Wildcat has jet sweep action and the option to run the ball wide or run counter plays creating indecision in the defense.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by I20goon

about 7mi down a dirt road

Member since Aug 2013

13110 posts

Posted on 9/29/16 at 7:54 am to Choupique19

quote:
A running back taking a direct snap is not "wildcat". Les would stick Ware and LF at qb and run power run plays. Wildcat has jet sweep action and the option to run the ball wide or run counter plays creating indecision in the defense.

LOL... very true. Also I always failed to see where 1 so-called wildcat, even if true wildcat, run stand-alone would have even close to the same effect [on the defense] that at least a series would have. Never quite understood that.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by camplsu

Section 210

Member since Feb 2007

1527 posts

Posted on 9/29/16 at 7:55 am to Choupique19

quote:
A running back taking a direct snap is not "wildcat". Les would stick Ware and LF at qb and run power run plays. Wildcat has jet sweep action and the option to run the ball wide or run counter plays creating indecision in the defen

LSU practiced the full wildcat series of plays.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by SG_Geaux

Beautiful St George

Member since Aug 2004

78080 posts

Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:19 am to Choupique19

quote:
A running back taking a direct snap is not "wildcat"

I have never heard wildcat referred to as anything more than a formation.

You are referring to it as if it is an offensive style like the spread.

quote:
Wildcat formation describes a formation for the offense in football in which the ball is snapped not to the quarterback but directly to a player of another position lined up at the quarterback position.

This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 8:21 am

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board