Started By
Message

re: I love the movie "Fury" but...

Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:15 pm to
So much wrong with OP. First of all, not a machine gun. Second of all, not a piece of shite. A lot of GIs wouldn't have survived the war had it gotten into the war earlier and been mass produced.

Also, it heavily influenced the Kalashnikov platform, which is pretty much the most successful infantry weapon of the modern era.

The one great point here was that hauling it around would have been impractical because it fired a cartridge that wouldn't be laying around all over the place. With regards to the movie, a guy like that might have just carried it around with a few mags just to be a bad arse and had a Thompson for his daily driver.
This post was edited on 9/7/16 at 3:30 pm
Posted by Corch Urban Myers
Columbus, OH
Member since Jul 2009
5993 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 4:34 pm to
quote:


Also, it heavily influenced the Kalashnikov platform


Infuencing it is one thing. Actually being a an effective weapon, is something else.

I think you know this, but just want to be an dick.

That's ok though, I forgive you.

This is the internet. People love to show their arse.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram