- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody have Low-T experience?
Posted on 9/2/16 at 5:37 am to TheIndulger
Posted on 9/2/16 at 5:37 am to TheIndulger
quote:
Why would the frequency of testing have an affect on the t levels of subjects?
Do you seriously not see the connection between your "factual" information of more men currently being diagnosed with low T compared to "decades past when they are testing for it now much more often as opposed to rarely testing for it in decades past?
Posted on 9/2/16 at 5:44 am to CorkSoaker
quote:
Do you seriously not see the connection between your "factual" information of more men currently being diagnosed with low T compared to "decades past when they are testing for it now much more often as opposed to rarely testing for it in decades past?
The reason that it's being tested for more now is that there's greater awareness of the issue.
In the past, the symptoms were dismissed as "middle age." Guys got tired, flabby, and less viral...and that was that.
Now, the medical community is armed with more knowledge of what makes men experience these symptoms as they approach the 35-50 timeframe.
Do you dismiss Autism as "lazy parenting," too?
Posted on 9/2/16 at 5:44 am to CorkSoaker
I'm sure you can find studies that account for your concerns in their sampling and population.
But even if true, that would likely be caused by an increase in understanding of the human body over time. It wouldn't be a bad thing.
Think autism
But even if true, that would likely be caused by an increase in understanding of the human body over time. It wouldn't be a bad thing.
Think autism
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 5:45 am
Posted on 9/2/16 at 11:08 am to CorkSoaker
quote:
Do you seriously not see the connection between your "factual" information of more men currently being diagnosed with low T compared to "decades past when they are testing for it now much more often as opposed to rarely testing for it in decades past?
Are you trolling? Serious question. I said testosteronelevels in men are lower now. I didn't say more men are diagnosed with low T. I said levels are lower. On a per capita basis.
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 11:10 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)