Started By
Message

re: Louisiana trout V.S. Texas trout

Posted on 7/26/16 at 2:04 pm to
Posted by rduple2
Belle Chasse
Member since Oct 2009
259 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 2:04 pm to
I've ready a few articles about different fisheries that state that a given fishery has a particular amount of biomass that it can sustain. If you reduce the number of fish taken from a given fishery, then the average sized fish goes down because there is less forage to go around. Some places are just set up to grow bigger fish.

The places in Louisiana that have bigger trout are areas that have access to deeper waters. Much of our marshes do not get that deep. I cannot speak for the Texas fisheries.
Posted by cheezag03
H-town
Member since Sep 2011
608 posts
Posted on 8/1/16 at 2:12 pm to
Upper Texas coast- Deeper bays. We still have a 10 fish limit. Inland side of bays is estuary with mix of back lakes, bayous, mud bottom, sand bottom on gulf boundary, and oysters. In Galveston we have 1000's of acres of oyster reefs

I have a 26"er to my name, but catch a ton of 14"ers. I wish the size limit was 14".

Most big fish are caught wading shorelines and flats, reefs, and islands. The big ones don't like the boats.

South of Sargent (North East Matagorda Bay)- typically shallower grass and sand flats and have gone to a 5 fish limit. I fish the West Matagorda/Port O'Connor area from time to time. For STAR tourney they still pull out 32"ers down there.

In Texas the talk is "Keep 5" and ban croakers. I wouldn't care either way, but don't think its a good idea to tell people how to fish.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram