Started By
Message

re: Review on these ARs

Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by rungunz
Member since Jul 2016
92 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

quote:
However, this isn't just about accuracy. If I'm buying a semi-automatic rifle, I want something that I can beat to shite. I want a work horse, not a show pony.


You don't think a Daniel Defense or a Larue will run right there with a KAC?

Never said they wouldn't. I'm really referring to Nemo, which costs as much or more than a KAC. I'm not saying Nemo isn't durable, but I won't be taking my chances.


quote:
I feel like some of you on this board have never heard of Google


trust us, we know you have

I guess you've learned everything you know about firearms from your deployments as an operator.

quote:
If you think Brand X is as good as/better/looks cooler than something that is proven, then by all means go for it.


there's your strawman again. im still waiting on you to offer up your list of superior components in the SR25 (just the bolt won't cut it) that justify its absurd pricing.






If you don't think the E3 bolt is a significant improvement contributing to the increased price of admission, then you don't have to buy it.
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 1:15 pm
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5872 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

If you don't think the E3 bolt is a significant improvement contributing to the increased price of admission, then you don't have to buy it.

Paying 4k+ for a rifle for it's bolt is fricken nuts. You have to be out of your damn mind if you think the bolt justifies the price.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram