- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:34 am to shawnlsu
quote:
He was well known in that area by cops and citizens alike.
I have seen that too and have wondered why. He apparently lived up Plank rd. This is a long way for him to travel to sell his CD's.
If he was that well known there, he must have made the long journey often, passing many third world mini marts that would have been more geographically convenient.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:48 am to shawnlsu
quote:
They knew him. He was well known in that area by cops and citizens alike. His past was no secret.
And you know this how? I am sure it is likely, but people keep stating this as fact with nothing to back it up. Until BRPD makes a statement about this, STFU.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 9:44 am to shawnlsu
If the officer knew Sterling and knew this information, it is totally admissible and pertinent.
Graham v. Connor
The Court then outlined a nonexhaustive list of factors for balancing an individual's rights and an officer's: "the severity of the crime at issue," "whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others," "whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight."
The Graham Court cautioned, "The "reasonableness" of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight." It also reinforced, "As in other Fourth Amendment contexts... the 'reasonableness' inquiry in an excessive force case is an objective one: the question is whether the officers' actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation."
Graham v. Connor
The Court then outlined a nonexhaustive list of factors for balancing an individual's rights and an officer's: "the severity of the crime at issue," "whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others," "whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight."
The Graham Court cautioned, "The "reasonableness" of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight." It also reinforced, "As in other Fourth Amendment contexts... the 'reasonableness' inquiry in an excessive force case is an objective one: the question is whether the officers' actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation."
This post was edited on 7/11/16 at 9:48 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News