Started By
Message

re: The 2009 Arrest of Alton Sterling

Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:16 am to
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:16 am to
quote:

I wouldn't be surprised that the officers knew Alton and knew his past.




They knew him. He was well known in that area by cops and citizens alike. His past was no secret.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
40402 posts
Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:34 am to
quote:

He was well known in that area by cops and citizens alike.


I have seen that too and have wondered why. He apparently lived up Plank rd. This is a long way for him to travel to sell his CD's.

If he was that well known there, he must have made the long journey often, passing many third world mini marts that would have been more geographically convenient.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
21759 posts
Posted on 7/11/16 at 8:48 am to
quote:

They knew him. He was well known in that area by cops and citizens alike. His past was no secret.


And you know this how? I am sure it is likely, but people keep stating this as fact with nothing to back it up. Until BRPD makes a statement about this, STFU.
Posted by Bulletproof Lover
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1900 posts
Posted on 7/11/16 at 9:44 am to
If the officer knew Sterling and knew this information, it is totally admissible and pertinent.

Graham v. Connor

The Court then outlined a nonexhaustive list of factors for balancing an individual's rights and an officer's: "the severity of the crime at issue," "whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others," "whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight."

The Graham Court cautioned, "The "reasonableness" of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight." It also reinforced, "As in other Fourth Amendment contexts... the 'reasonableness' inquiry in an excessive force case is an objective one: the question is whether the officers' actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation."

This post was edited on 7/11/16 at 9:48 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram