Started By
Message

re: Is anyone still against mandatory body cameras?

Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6666 posts
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


Who's paying? I don't think anyone is opposed to the idea, but that's not free, and our city/state isn't exactly flush with cash.


The federal government loves to hand out some seriously expensive artillery to local LEO agencies for basically free. Maybe next year, instead of getting 2 mine resistant vehicles with grenade launchers, the only get one and a box of GoPro's.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
31597 posts
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:40 pm to
They don't hand it out, Obama allowed them to purchase crap we don't need from 2 wars. Does a local office "need" it...no, but it's probably cheaper than them buying another tahoe.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19909 posts
Posted on 7/7/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

The federal government loves to hand out some seriously expensive artillery to local LEO agencies for basically free. Maybe next year, instead of getting 2 mine resistant vehicles with grenade launchers, the only get one and a box of GoPro's.



Its not just buying the cameras, its maintaining and storing the videos as well. Larger departments have entire sections with 6-12 people dedicated to just maintaining in dash camera videos that are recorded on VHS/DVDs, now you are going to throw body cams in. Then theres converting old footage to new digital, which then brings servers into the mix. Its not cheap by any means and not every department can afford it and the fed can't float every single dept in america.

I'm not against cameras, but its not at straight forward as everybody thinks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram