Started By
Message

re: Zach M waived by Titans 0-10

Posted on 5/16/16 at 9:38 am to
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8557 posts
Posted on 5/16/16 at 9:38 am to
I'm not saying he played great, but the Titans did not give him every chance. Had they traded down in last year's draft and upgraded the O-line, then you can say they gave him every chance. Just because he played doesn't mean they gave him every chance. The Titans have been garbage for years and with Mariota's durability problems, I don't see that changing any time soon.
Posted by blkhawktiger
Glad All Over
Member since Nov 2011
2014 posts
Posted on 5/16/16 at 9:51 am to
Only LSU fans would suggest trading down to select lineman to protect Mett over drafting Mariota.

quote:

The Titans have been garbage for years


While this is certainly true, it has absolutely nothing to do with a discussion over giving Mett his chance to prove what he's worth. His poor decision making, work ethic, poor accuracy on short throws, and concrete feet got him waived.

He regressed in his second year. He had a 13.6 QBR in 7 games last year. As bad as Matt Cassel was in Dallas, he still had a 33.7 QBR in 9 games, for perspective.

Defend him all you want. Blame the Titans all you want. When given opportunities, he was horribly below average. That's not debatable.
This post was edited on 5/16/16 at 9:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram