- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Force Awakens Revisited
Posted on 4/20/16 at 10:44 pm to Rou Leed
Posted on 4/20/16 at 10:44 pm to Rou Leed
It was a "setup movie" for a trilogy. I hate that they did that, but it happened.
The beauty of the originals is that they all meshed well without feeling too episodic. Stories were brought up and concluded by the end of the movie. You always had the "how will they defeat the empire?!" story but everything else was given closure in every movie.
With this one they were OBVIOUSLY going for a trilogy to tell a story. TFA wasn't bad by any means but I hate how it was made to be a "Part 1".
The beauty of the originals is that they all meshed well without feeling too episodic. Stories were brought up and concluded by the end of the movie. You always had the "how will they defeat the empire?!" story but everything else was given closure in every movie.
With this one they were OBVIOUSLY going for a trilogy to tell a story. TFA wasn't bad by any means but I hate how it was made to be a "Part 1".
1
Posted on 4/20/16 at 11:10 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
With this one they were OBVIOUSLY going for a trilogy to tell a story. TFA wasn't bad by any means but I hate how it was made to be a "Part 1".
It's more of a bridge between the old and the new that sets up a movie and a sequel
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News