- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Saints have met with QB Paxton Lynch 3 times
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:12 pm to PurpleDrank18
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:12 pm to PurpleDrank18
If we hit on two picks in the first three rounds, it absolutely could transform our D in the next 1-2 years.
...the other rounds matter but the 12th pick is weighted for obvious reasons. First three rounds weighted much more than others. Likelihood of landing a starter is much higher. You understand this, I know. We shouldn't waste an early round pick.
What if we land another Cam Jordan...or heaven forbid, a Von Miller (I know he was the second pick), but a great pass rusher or LB could change the D.
Or maybe a Terron Armstead equivalent at G in the third round. Will we nail these picks? probably not, but two QBs in the first three rounds two years in a row who have no chance to get on the field for at least two seasons is asinine.
We'd be shooting ourselves in the foot, closing the window on our own. Doing the job for Father Time before it's time.
...the other rounds matter but the 12th pick is weighted for obvious reasons. First three rounds weighted much more than others. Likelihood of landing a starter is much higher. You understand this, I know. We shouldn't waste an early round pick.
What if we land another Cam Jordan...or heaven forbid, a Von Miller (I know he was the second pick), but a great pass rusher or LB could change the D.
Or maybe a Terron Armstead equivalent at G in the third round. Will we nail these picks? probably not, but two QBs in the first three rounds two years in a row who have no chance to get on the field for at least two seasons is asinine.
We'd be shooting ourselves in the foot, closing the window on our own. Doing the job for Father Time before it's time.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:17 pm to drake20
Paxton Lynch is the guy though right? Not any of the guys that are top 3 picks in every draft. We'll have an opportunity at those guys when Brees is done, and I trust Payton to handle that well.
Not to mention, we'll never be like the Rams because of Payton. He can run a solid offense with an average QB. I believe that.
Not to mention, we'll never be like the Rams because of Payton. He can run a solid offense with an average QB. I believe that.
This post was edited on 4/18/16 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:30 pm to drake20
quote:
If we hit on two picks in the first three rounds, it absolutely could transform our D in the next 1-2 years.
That's a big if. And assume we do, by the time those guys are impacts enough to transform this defense, the Brees window will have all but been shut. Honestly the only "impact" guys I see in this draft that would most likely be available are Lawson and possibly Rankins. To use your Von example. You're right he was the #2 overall pick, and honestly that makes a huge difference. To make that comparable you'd have to assume that Ramsey, Bosa, Jack or Buckner would be available, as those are the only defensive players even close to his level now and as a prospect back when. And those guys are not falling to 12. (If Jack does that's because about 10 other teams felt his medical red flags were to worrisome, and that bothers me.)
I will also say this. Let's assume our first round defensive pick takes 2-3 years to fully blossom (not an outrageous claim by any stretch). Let's also say in another reality we take Lynch, and he sits behind Brees for 2-3 years. If they were both to reach their potential after a couple of years I guarantee Lynch would be more valuable to this team than said defensive player. And said defensive player would not have done enough in those first couple years to truly change this team to the point that it gives Brees one more shot at a SB in a possibly already closed window.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:44 pm to drake20
And if you want my super honest opinion, Drake, here it is. While this may not be the popular, fun or optimistic opinion, I do believe our window is over. At least the SB Window.
With the right moves and hitting on early picks in the next year or two I think we can still be competitive in the division, and possibly give some teams trouble in playoffs (again IF a lot of right moves are made). But I don't think this is a SB team constructed as is, especially the more years that go by with Drew getting older and older. And I don't think any rookie, regardless of position is going to do enough in the next 2-3 years to change that.
Again, just my belief. I hope on everything im wrong, and I'll be glad if I am. But I don't think I am, unfortunately.
With the right moves and hitting on early picks in the next year or two I think we can still be competitive in the division, and possibly give some teams trouble in playoffs (again IF a lot of right moves are made). But I don't think this is a SB team constructed as is, especially the more years that go by with Drew getting older and older. And I don't think any rookie, regardless of position is going to do enough in the next 2-3 years to change that.
Again, just my belief. I hope on everything im wrong, and I'll be glad if I am. But I don't think I am, unfortunately.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News