Started By
Message

re: Next James Bond should be black

Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:12 am to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:12 am to
quote:

I have no problem with a black Bond if they acknowledge that the name is an alias just like the agent call sign. It acknowledges previous white 007s and this one just happens to be black.


There would have to be so many coincidences for Bond to simply be an alias:

1. Every Bond has been a card playing, vodka loving, womanzing white male.

2. Every Bond has had the backstory of being an orphan with his parents dying in an accident at a young age.

3. Each Bond takes their martinis the same way, deliver witty one liners, and introduce themselves in the exact same way.

4. Every Bond since Lazenby (save Brosnan and Craig) has acknowledged or hinted at the death of his spouse. Roger Moore's Bond even visited Tracy Bond's grave, thus acknowledging that the George Lazenby Bond and Roger Moore Bond were the same person. That means Connery's Bond also must be the same Bond because On Her Majesty's Secret Service is sandwiched between two Connery films (You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever). Why would two different men be using the Bond alias within MI6 at the same time?

Dalton's Bond, too, shares a tragic past in regards to losing a wife. In License to Kill it is mentioned by Felix Leiter to his new bride that Bond had been married once and that she had died.

Brosnan's Bond is disliked by the new M because she feels he has outlived his usefulness to the agency. "A relic of the Cold War," she calls him in Goldeneye. This heavily implies that Brosnan's Bond was very active as a spy throughout the contest with the Soviets. Which means, if the alias theory is correct, he would have been running around at the same time as the Moore and Dalton Bonds. Again...why have multiple men within MI6 using the same alias?

And the evidence points to Craig's Bond being the same incarnation as the Bond delivered to us by Sean Connery due to the fact that a) they're both from Scotland b) they both lost their parents in a climbing accident and c) they both drive the same 1964 Aston-Martin (equipped with the same features and everything).

And since I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Connery-Lazenby-Moore-Dalton-Brosnan Bond are all the same man, it stands to reason that Craig should be lumped in with them as well.


This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 1:37 am
Posted by Matisyeezy
End of the bar, Drunk
Member since Feb 2012
16624 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:36 am to
quote:

And since I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Connery-Lazenby-Moore-Dalton-Brosnan Bond are all the same man, it stands to reason that Craig should be lumped in with them as well.



Great, so they are all the same person. My statement still stands with one super minor change --

quote:

I have no problem with a black Bond if they acknowledge that the name is an alias just like the agent call sign. It acknowledges the previous white 007 (singular, not plural) and this one just happens to be black.


The "Black Bond" is a replacement. And we're assuming this replacement is by virtue of his qualifications and not simply because he's black. People age and retire, or perhaps even meet untimely ends. That there would be a replacement is entirely logical. There are ways that this transition could be done tastefully and with respect to the source. I hate to say it because I'm loathe to throw this term around, but categorical dismissal of the idea based purely upon skin color is inherently discriminatory. You could just wait and judge a product based upon its actual merits (assuming it would actually be made, which is unlikely), or at least be willing to admit that it has the potential to be good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram