- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homeowner for the win
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:39 am to TigernMS12
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:39 am to TigernMS12
Wrong. There is obviously more to the story. Even going off your ramblings, the home owner had the right to THREATEN to shoot the burglar to stop him outside his house while on his property.
At that point, if he reached in his back pocket, the home owner is fearing for his life. He shot him. He gets away every time.
That's why I said there is more to this story.
At that point, if he reached in his back pocket, the home owner is fearing for his life. He shot him. He gets away every time.
That's why I said there is more to this story.
1
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:44 am to Real Pirate
quote:
the home owner had the right to THREATEN to shoot the burglar to stop him outside his house while on his property.
This is correct; however, you do not have the right to use deadly force.
quote:
if he reached in his back pocket, the home owner is fearing for his life. He shot him. He gets away every time.
I would agree with this also; however, in this case the jury did not. You never know how a jury will see things. Your belief that your life is in danger for the purposes of self-defense is determined objectively, not subjectively, which is why I am assuming the jury convicted.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News