Started By
Message

re: Homeowner for the win

Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:00 pm to
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5540 posts
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Clames


Ok, please enlighten me?
This post was edited on 3/13/16 at 11:07 pm
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16718 posts
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:14 pm to
Your Google broke or something? You mention Castle Doctrine but apparently don't understand how it works or the case histories which are very important in understanding how the law itself is applied. That varies by state by the way so your blanket statement means nothing in states like Texas, Louisiana, and Florida (context clue right there). Texas mentions burglary in statute which makes it very robust as a defense, other states have broadly defined "residence" and "dwelling" to apply to the property as a whole and not strictly under the roof as you seem to think. Then there is the fact that Florida is one state among many with no "duty to retreat" which in effect extends Castle Doctrine to any place a person has the legal right to be. Now put all this together with the fact that Trevon confronted the person he was burglarizing on their own property and maybe you can start to see where it isn't as cut and dried as you believe.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram