- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tank Watch 2016: 3/3 Update
Posted on 3/3/16 at 8:44 am to 504ByrdGang
Posted on 3/3/16 at 8:44 am to 504ByrdGang
quote:
No we are fine at 3 positions PG,SG, and PF
I beg to differ that we are fine at SG. IMO, there are only two positions that are solidified, PG and PF. Every other position needs to be addressed either through the draft are free agency. If we don't fall in the top 6, I'm all for them taking the best player available that will fill one of the positions of need and that player is Buddy Hield for me. IMO, Hield is the only player in the entire draft that can make an immediate impact on a roster the day he is drafted. I'm not saying he's the best player or the one with the most potential, but he's ready to contribute significantly right now. That's something the Pels desperately needs.
This post was edited on 3/3/16 at 8:48 am
Posted on 3/3/16 at 8:51 am to Hammond Tiger Fan
quote:
I beg to differ that we are fine at SG. IMO, there are only two positions that are solidified, PG and PF. Every other position needs to be addressed either through the draft are free agency. If we don't fall in the top 6, I'm all for them taking the best player available that will fill one of the positions of need and that player is Buddy Hield for me.
We have Q a 3 and D off ball guy and a lock down defender. I know people don't like reke but he isn't going anywhere and he also provides options at that position. We can also go out in FA and sign a guy like Bazemore this season. Meanwhile unless you draft them or max them you aren't getting a good sf so how about we actually develop one. I know the whole idea of developing young players in new to this franchise but looking at other teams it just might work. We have our hugest holes at the 3 and 5 where we get 0 production and that's what hurts us the must. Its been put off for years putting band aids on it but its time to address it in the right way. Simmons, Ingram, Brown, Luwawu give me one of them.
This post was edited on 3/3/16 at 8:56 am
Posted on 3/3/16 at 8:51 am to Hammond Tiger Fan
quote:
I beg to differ that we are fine at SG.
If you had better options at SF you could play QPon at SG. QPon + BDJ + MLE level FA would be "fine". It might not be a strength, but it wouldn't be a problem either.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News