- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defense Lawyers point of view for using your concealed firearm
Posted on 2/17/16 at 11:19 am to SpeckledTiger
Posted on 2/17/16 at 11:19 am to SpeckledTiger
Well it happened 20 something years ago so maybe that law didn't exist?
I wouldn't call shooting someone who rang the doorbell reasonable use of deadly force. If that guy wouldn't have answered the door, that kid may still be alive today.
quote:
A. A person who uses reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence for the purpose of preventing a forcible offense against the person or his property in accordance with R.S. 14:19 or 20 is immune from civil action for the use of reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence.
I wouldn't call shooting someone who rang the doorbell reasonable use of deadly force. If that guy wouldn't have answered the door, that kid may still be alive today.
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 11:25 am
Posted on 2/17/16 at 11:42 am to Barf
quote:
Well it happened 20 something years ago so maybe that law didn't exist?
Must be this. I didn't realize it was that long ago.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)