Started By
Message

re: Cancer rates in SWLA

Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:49 pm to
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
14966 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

At least one chemical plant on the river in the river parishes stored large quantities of chlorinated organic liquid byproducts in barrels. These were loaded onto barges and eventually dumped off shore in the Gulf of Mexico. This was in the 60's and 70's. They also direct injected this organic waste into ground disposal wells. They eventually installed incinerators to burn the organic wastes and produce hydrochloric acid.

A lot of organic pollution happened I'm sure at other chemical plants in the 60's and 70's.

I'm pretty sure there is still organic pollution that doesn't get reported, but the environmental pollution today is not nearly as bad as in the past


I'm not debating the point of industrial pollution. I'm more in defense on the side of agricultural pollutants from farmers. Which is what this guy seems is the problem.

No shite chemical corps fricked the area up with waste.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
39058 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I'm not debating the point of industrial pollution. I'm more in defense on the side of agricultural pollutants from farmers. Which is what this guy seems is the problem.

No shite chemical corps fricked the area up with waste.


I could absolutely be wrong but this specific area is an agricultural one. There is no petrochemical history in this particular area.

Why does this small agricultural area miles to the east have such a high rate of cancer when you have the chemical dumps of Westlake and Sulphur nearby?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram