- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3-4 Okie defense...
Posted on 2/3/16 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 2/3/16 at 5:54 pm
Les Miles repeated said that LSU will be using a 3-4 Okie defense. Can anyone tell me how this is different from a regular 3-4? I searched a couple of websites but I'm still not sure how is varies from a regular 3-4. I have heard of a 3-4 under but not a 3-4 okie.
5
Posted on 2/3/16 at 5:59 pm to toughcrittercrumb
More of a 3-3-5 look than a 3-4. You can have they ability to walk a SS down to play a variation of a OLB role
Posted on 2/3/16 at 6:02 pm to toughcrittercrumb
At Wisky, Aranda ran a 3-4 1 gap scheme. Has experience running all types of schemes, so no idea what scheme he will run here.
But he had all that success at Wisky running the 3-4 1 gap scheme. And you would think that we hired him based off of the success he had there. So i expect to see the 1 gap scheme from our D.
But he had all that success at Wisky running the 3-4 1 gap scheme. And you would think that we hired him based off of the success he had there. So i expect to see the 1 gap scheme from our D.
Posted on 2/3/16 at 6:10 pm to toughcrittercrumb
Okie means : #33 is going to rape all year..... 
Posted on 2/3/16 at 6:10 pm to toughcrittercrumb
All I know is Adams, Beckwith and Key, et al are going to destroy opponents in 2016-2017 under Aranda.
Posted on 2/3/16 at 6:27 pm to toughcrittercrumb
I'm not sure how that would work tbh. We're going to be extremely weak at LB next year even with Beckwith returning and the d-line/secondary should be a huge strength. More DBs would make sense but not less lineman, IMO.
Honestly, a 3-3-5 would probably work well against certain teams we play but I couldn't see us doing that exclusively. I think he's going to adjust it based on the strengths we have which should be DB as #1 and the DL as #2 maybe even #1 with LB being a huge weakness. Even if we kept Fowler today I still don't think the LBs would be weak with Beckwith back. Divinity will probably come in and get a starting job but it might be unrealistic to expect him to be a great starter.
Honestly, a 3-3-5 would probably work well against certain teams we play but I couldn't see us doing that exclusively. I think he's going to adjust it based on the strengths we have which should be DB as #1 and the DL as #2 maybe even #1 with LB being a huge weakness. Even if we kept Fowler today I still don't think the LBs would be weak with Beckwith back. Divinity will probably come in and get a starting job but it might be unrealistic to expect him to be a great starter.
This post was edited on 2/3/16 at 6:38 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News