Started By
Message

re: OB motorheads- will supercharging a 6.0L V8 gas engine

Posted on 1/26/16 at 9:53 am to
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 1/26/16 at 9:53 am to
It'll decrease the MPG. Due to: parasitic drag via the belt that runs it, plus, with engines, more air = more fuel = lower MPG. This is the reason that in real world driving the Ford EcoBoost is anything but economical. Granted, with turbos, you don't have the parasitic drag issue, but you do have the more air = more fuel = lower MPG issue. If people were capable of driving it without getting "into boost" it would be more economical than a V8 because it would essentially be a 3.5L, which is more economical than a 5.0, 5.3, 6.2l due to lower displacement. But, once you spool the turbos up, the air charge per liter is denser than it is in a larger NA motor and thus so must be the fuel charge, and as such, the amount of fuel being used more or less evens out.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66948 posts
Posted on 1/26/16 at 9:58 am to
Shall we delve into volumetric efficiency, heat recovery, etc

Forced induction increased efficiency across the board and will nearly always yield better fuel mileage in the real world if you keep your foot out of it. It takes X horsepower to move said vehicle 60mph and the one with forced induction will do it with less fuel, all else being equal.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/26/16 at 10:53 am to
I've always said that about the ecos. If you drive them like you should, you get better mpg. But no one does
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram