Started By
Message

re: Gating canals in houma area

Posted on 2/8/16 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by Scrowe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2010
2926 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Do you think you could articulate to everyone who isn't a land owner or lease holder that they are confined to the couple hundred thousand acres of WMA marsh?


This isn't how it currently exist so quit making it so.

quote:

All the while their tax dollars are going to help restore and slow erosion on YOUR private property that in large was caused by YOUR man made canals?


Do you have proof that it was caused "in large" by the canals?

There are so many tax payer projects that are available to small groups. Also, just because you pay into the tax pool you can't say that your dollar directly impacted a project and if so you're such a small contributor to the overall amount that you are a small percent of a small percent of the funding.
Posted by Barf
EBR
Member since Feb 2015
3727 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Do you have proof that it was caused "in large" by the canals?


Are you kidding?

LINK /

quote:

quote:

a U.S. Department of Interior report says oil and gas canals are ultimately responsible for 30 to 59 percent of coastal land loss. In some areas of Barataria Bay, said Turner at LSU, it’s close to 90 percent.





quote:

From 1930 to 1990, as much as 16 percent of the wetlands was turned to open water as those canals were dredged. But as the U.S. Department of the Interior and many others have reported, the indirect damages far exceeded that:
Saltwater creeped in
Canal systems leading to the Gulf allowed saltwater into the heart of freshwater marshes and swamps, killing plants and trees whose roots held the soils together. As a side effect, the annual supply of plant detritus — one way a delta disconnected from its river can maintain its elevation — was seriously reduced.
Shorelines crumbled
Without fresh sediment and dead plants, shorelines began to collapse, increasing the size of existing water bodies. Wind gained strength over ever-larger sections of open water, adding to land loss. Fishers and other boaters used canals as shortcuts across the wetlands; their wakes also sped shoreline erosion. In some areas, canals grew twice as wide within five years.
Spoil levees buried and trapped wetlands
When companies dredged canals, they dumped the soil they removed alongside, creating “spoil levees” that could rise higher than 10 feet and twice as wide.
The weight of the spoil on the soft, moist delta caused the adjacent marshes to sink. In locations of intense dredging, spoil levees impounded acres of wetlands. The levees also impeded the flow of water — and sediments — over wetlands during storm tides.
If there were 10,000 miles of canals, there were 20,000 miles of levees. Researchers estimate that canals and levees eliminated or covered 8 million acres of wetlands.


LINK
quote:

Dredging canals for oil and gas exploration and pipelines provided our nation with critical energy supplies, but these activities also took a toll on the landscape, weakening marshes and allowing salt water to spread higher into coastal basins. Sea level rise, subsidence, storms, and invasive species add further stress.”


This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 3:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram