- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lindsey Scott Part 7
Posted on 1/11/16 at 11:29 pm to misey94
Posted on 1/11/16 at 11:29 pm to misey94
quote:
McVitte would be 2b to Russo's 2A. Both are better fits in our current offense than Scott.
That might be true. But with as much as we hand the ball off, I wonder what fit really means. I do agree that if we could take a taller guy with same abilities as the shorter guy, go with the taller guy. But will have to wait and see... I do think that "fit" means what Cam and Les prefer, and that all that matters. But in terms of abilities, I dont doubt that any of the three could run our system.
1
Posted on 1/11/16 at 11:52 pm to prepsportsallday
All I hear is National Championships. When is the last time a 5'9"-5' 11" quarterback helmed a National Championship team? Or for that matter an SEC West Championship team? I watched Scott play and he is good, but his height hurts him. It is a shame, but it is what it is. Unless he runs a 4.4 40. Oh, but then he is listed as an athlete. Does Russell Shepherd come to mind? I would not mind signing Scott, just not as our 1st and only quarterback at this time.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News