- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rap "belief is meeting w Loomis was about compensation"
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:23 pm to Patrick O Rly
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:23 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
I don't think trading a coach is as simple as trading a player. All parties must be happy with the transaction or it'll never happen.
If I'm trading FOR Payton, I need to know a) he's fine with the trade details and b) he's willing to sign an extension with his new team.
If A doesn't happen, then B wouldn't happen, so a team wouldn't even bother.
It's not like a player where he just has to suck up and deal with it. You'd have one disgruntled person running the entire show.
Actually, I think it would be easier. The Saints couldn't care less if Payton would be willing to sign an extension with a new team. The only parties who would have to be happy are the Saints and the team giving them picks. If you are the team acquiring him you are giving him a new contract, not extending the existing contract.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News