re: Food for thought: Angry Gazillionaire who was ponying up buyout.....

I'm not patronizing you. That response was more to the board in general. And even in that context, it wasn't patronizing. It was trying to adjust the perspective based on my humble opinion. Sorry if it came off as condescending.

I don't blame the president for considering everything in excess of the athletic department any more than I blame the director of Athletics for not convincing the powers of the importance of his area of responsibilities.