- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hypo: How would committee handle the SEC situation w/ Ole Miss
Posted on 11/29/15 at 10:53 am to Eighteen
Posted on 11/29/15 at 10:53 am to Eighteen
quote:
I think it could've started a huge national conversation about the elimination of conference championship games because a lot of people would be asking "what's the point?"
CCG would be irrelevant. Both division winners would have two losses and a runner up would have 1 loss. The question would be over how to address nonconference games and the fact that teams in the same division have radically different OOC schedules.
The committee seems to put a lot of weight on conference champions, and I agree with them. If you didn't win your conference, then you didn't take care of business on the field. Tough cookies.
1
Posted on 11/29/15 at 11:04 am to Bestbank Tiger
So when LSU got in over Georgia in 2007, the argument was "Georgia didn't even win their own division".
So people are talking about Bama over Ole Miss (hypothetical) because "Bama is better and conference championships don't matter"? Show some consistency.
So people are talking about Bama over Ole Miss (hypothetical) because "Bama is better and conference championships don't matter"? Show some consistency.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News