Started By
Message

re: LSU is putrid in Red Zone Defense

Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by studentsect
Member since Jan 2004
2271 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:59 pm to
The poor TD:FG ratio is partly because LSU's offense is so good that the redzone is 4 down territory for opponents.

Off the top of my head I can think of at least 3 TDs that came after fourth down conversions in the redzone that might have otherwise been FGs. And 3+ out of 17 is a large enough % to skew things.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

The poor TD:FG ratio is partly because LSU's offense is so good that the redzone is 4 down territory for opponents.

Off the top of my head I can think of at least 3 TDs that came after fourth down conversions in the redzone that might have otherwise been FGs. And 3+ out of 17 is a large enough % to skew things.


That's a good point. Florida went for it on fourth down and scored a touchdown. I would point out, however, that they did that on the opening drive of the game. So your reasoning doesn't quite follow. They just knew that they had to have every point to beat LSU out of the gate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram