Started By
Message

re: I just now finished the Serial podcast

Posted on 9/23/15 at 7:49 am to
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
21789 posts
Posted on 9/23/15 at 7:49 am to
I haven't had time to listen to Undisclosed, but is it an unedited transcript of the original trial? If not, my point stands.

As for the lawyers presenting on that podcast, would lawyers have anything to gain by being associated with such a cultural phenomenon such as Serial?

It's interesting that these lawyers weren't involved in the original podcast when it wasn't a known avenue to fame in their profession.

If those lawyers did have something to gain from being involved with a highly visible project such as this, would they be more or less likely to be included if their analysis agreed with the producer's narrative?

Were other lawyers interviewed whose opinions were not included in the final product?

These are important questions are they not?

And any lawyer worth their salt can look at a case and present the argument for both sides. It is the basic foundation of legal education. The Socratic method. There is no right answer, just more questions.

Luckily for the Serial producers, most people don't want questions, only answers.






Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 9/23/15 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I haven't had time to listen to Undisclosed, but is it an unedited transcript of the original trial? If not, my point stands.


No, no it doesn't.

Well, not unless your point is that you are a full blown retard. Was that your point?

I mean, do you even realize how comprehensively ridiculous what you're saying is?

I had a preliminary hearing two weeks ago and it ran about an hour and a half because there were three codefendants, all with lawyers who had a right to cross examine the state's witnesses. i recorded the hearing, as is customary, and it's about an hour and a half. Would you have more knowledge of the case if you listened to the 90 minutes of audio or if you just read the following sentence. A guy who had spoken to a girl about doing his hair gets a call from the girl to come outside of his apartment, and os he does, but then he sees three dudes that appear to be with the girl and that he thinks are trying to run up on him and so he runs up to his apartment -- where a party is going on -- and tries to get inside but the girl sticks her foot in the door to prevent him from shutting it so he pushes her down on the ground but all the while the three dudes are running up the stairs ansd shortly after he shuts the door he hears shots fired, and then the morning he notices that his friend, who was sleeping in the other room caught one in the face and is dead.

Okay, maybe i could have broken that into three or four sentecnes. But the point remains, and if it isn't crystla focking clear to you how dumb what you're saying is then I think you're beyond helping. Because that ain't lawyer shite. That's common sense shite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram