Started By
Message

re: This trade got vetoed. Please give me your thoughts

Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by PokerChamp21
Member since Apr 2006
20125 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:20 pm to
They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 4:21 pm
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"


Clearly not collusion and shouldn't be vetoed. I would not play in that league if that is how vetoes go.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
159146 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 4:33 pm to
that's why trades shouldn't lie in the votes of other kelly owners
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54989 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

They said the team receiving the Hopkins/Mathews side was "trade raping the other guy"


Who cares, if both owners are willing it goes through. End of discussion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram