Started By
Message

re: Gay Marriage Spinoff: Where should the new line be drawn on marriage?

Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65022 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I think they should. There is absolutely no legal ground for not allowing incestuous marriage and the idea that incest leads to grave genetic disorders has been largely debunked. The only thing not allowing close relatives to marry is the "yuck" factor that has permeated our society over the years. The U.S. is one of very few jurisdictions in the world that largely prohibits inter-family marriage.




Good points. I am personally opposed to incestuous marriage. But like I just said above, I base that on moral rather than legal grounds. From a legal standpoint, now that marriage is no longer limited to only one man and one woman, there is really no "legal" basis to deny the right to marry to anyone who is of age of consent. Simply put, moral grounds or "yuck factor" cannot be used to limit marriage any longer.
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32649 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 5:04 pm to
quote:


Good points. I am personally opposed to incestuous marriage

Why? Marriage and a sexual relationship are not the same thing. If a person wants to enter a tax dodge relationship with each other and/or many others, why not let them. It goes back to you OP/ETA. The state should not be marrying people, nor give tax credits for it, nor give credits for being a single parent.

If people want to get married, that should be something they arrange with their church.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram