- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Worse talent level in Payton era
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:53 pm to TigerBait1127
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:53 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
No, we don't. I know what a statistical average is, but you seem to miss it
Average NFL starter dude. This conversation is about what our overall talent looks like. You make no point when you say that our starting WR is above average relative to the entire population of WRs in the league. That certainly wasn't the point I was trying to make and only an idiot would have thought that.
quote:
32 teams in the NFL. So if he's #51, he would still be above average as an NFL wide receiver
How does it make any sense to think that i'm not talking about starters when trying to evaluate the talent level? Colston is a starter. He's not an above average starter.
quote:
Cool, just study up on the definition of average
Congrats. You've successfully played the semantics game and in the process lost total site of the conversation at hand.
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 9/2/15 at 11:11 pm to moneyg
quote:
Congrat[quote]You make no point when you say that our starting WR is above average relative to the entire population of WRs in the league.That certainly wasn't the point I was trying to make and only an idiot would have thought that.
That isn't what I said actually. I'd consider a starting WR a WR#3 in a good bit of offenses these days, and I think that colston is above average in that regard
quote:
How does it make any sense to think that i'm not talking about starters when trying to evaluate the talent level? Colston is a starter. He's not an above average starter.
Because I wouldnt consider him a #1 but would still consider him a solid #2 and a WELL above average receiver
Despite his drops last season:
33rd in yards, 16th in Yrds/Catch, 46th in TDs, 35th in Yrds/Game.
All look above average to me, especially for a NFL #2
quote:
Congrats. You've successfully played the semantics game and in the process lost total site of the conversation at hand.
Look, only an idiot would argue that Strief isn't an above average RT then double down to a year further as evidence of aging and regression. We all know that aging really happens inversely.
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 11:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News