- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anybody here know the actual legal issue(s) in the Tom Brady court case?
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:59 pm to baybeefeetz
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:59 pm to baybeefeetz
Basically I think it will be upheld.
Brady (through his union) collectively bargained with the league to have Goodell be judge, jury and executioner when it comes to the NFL disciplining players. Therefore, the only question is whether Brady received due process as it concerns his suspension. Again, this is going to be viewed through the parameters of the CBA. There should be no consideration as to whether Brady is guilty or not guilty or whether he slept with Goodell's wife or deflated a football. It will simply be the judge looking at the process Brady received and determining if it was "fundamentally fair." If it was then it will be upheld, if it wasn't it wont.
Brady (through his union) collectively bargained with the league to have Goodell be judge, jury and executioner when it comes to the NFL disciplining players. Therefore, the only question is whether Brady received due process as it concerns his suspension. Again, this is going to be viewed through the parameters of the CBA. There should be no consideration as to whether Brady is guilty or not guilty or whether he slept with Goodell's wife or deflated a football. It will simply be the judge looking at the process Brady received and determining if it was "fundamentally fair." If it was then it will be upheld, if it wasn't it wont.
This post was edited on 8/31/15 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 8/31/15 at 2:05 pm to Larry
I don't even think it's as amorphous as "due process." Basically if the arbitrator didn't disregard the contract and engaged in usual "contract interpretation," his decision sticks.
It is hard to show that an arbitrator ignored a contract and "did his own thing."
It is hard to show that an arbitrator ignored a contract and "did his own thing."
This post was edited on 8/31/15 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 8/31/15 at 2:06 pm to Larry
quote:
Brady (through his union) collectively bargained with the league to have Goodell be judge, jury and executioner when it comes to the NFL disciplining players. Therefore, the only question is whether Brady received due process as it concerns his suspension. Again, this is going to be viewed through the parameters of the CBA. There should be no consideration as to whether Brady is guilty or not guilty or whether he slept with Goodell's wife or deflated a football. It will simply be the judge looking at the process Brady received and determining if it was "fundamentally fair." If it was then it will be upheld, if it wasn't it wont.
Except that Berman was digging through the NFL's case with a fine tooth comb, and as quoted, cases have been vacated for certain stunts the NFL pulled during it's appeals process.
quote:
Berman: "I believe some arbitration awards have been vacated" because a witness was not allowed to be called without explanation
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News