Started By
Message

re: Northwestern players denied request to form first union for athletes

Posted on 8/17/15 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

But the slippery slope this will lead to will only benefit the rich. Your traditional powerhouses with money will have an even larger strangle hold on the market of players.


The slippery slope is a logical fallacy. It's taught in logic classes and everything.

Also, how is that different from now? I'm terrified that if we implement reform, Ohio St, FSU, Bama, USC, and other football powers will dominate recruiting.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28172 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 5:47 pm to
The vast majority of college athletes don't generate revenue, let alone a net profit, for their school. If we are to reform the system entirely, we could risk upending college sports as we know it. It would make the ramifications of Title IX look like child's play.

There are a number of problems that people bring up, with no uniformity of solutions. Usually, the goal posts of the situation shift between how much a Leonard Fournette generates for LSU vs. the issues of players not having time to have a job. Those are entirely separate issues.

Unfortunately, I think the tide of public opinion is turning such that your average MSB poster thinks he is trying to help out an underprivileged kid and that some drunk tailgater posting on the rant is a selfish racist trying to keep college athletes down. I think that's overly simplistic and ignores some of the huge difficulties in coming up with a solution...ie, where does all the money come from?
This post was edited on 8/17/15 at 5:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram