Started By
Message

re: Antman was atrocious (spoilers)

Posted on 7/18/15 at 12:29 am to
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 7/18/15 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Wait seriously, how can someone not like GotG, that shite was Star Wars for a new generation- humor, action, romance and a bitching sound track.


Yeah I am pretty much ignoring the OP...he is wrong.

Antman was a decent but not spectacular origin story...far and away better then Avengers 2. I think another movie or two and Rudd will be Scott Lang.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36204 posts
Posted on 7/18/15 at 12:56 am to
I found that Ant-Man was more fluid and more of a complete film than Ultron. And I say that even with the record scratches in Ant-Man that occurred with every mention of the Avengers.

The Avengers stuff seemed to be forced into the script. The entire assault on Avengers bunker seemed like an added scene.

The action was okay, but once you've seen Iron Man soar or Thor fight Frost Giants or Steve Rogers jump on a grenade... running around with ants seems pretty tame.

The fight scenes were pretty blah. We've seen fight scenes with teleporters in the X-Men movies that looked fairly cool. Ant-Man appearing and punching just wasn't anything special.

But it was decent and didn't get too stupid. I really think they were trying to play it safe and just get a decent movie out on schedule.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram