- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Game of Thrones Season 5 In the Books vs. In The Show, spoilers
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:27 am to NIH
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:27 am to NIH
I haven't found that the changes from the book are that bothersome. Some I think were very good choices (deleting Young Griff and all the Shy Maid stuff for example). Some I am neutral on (leaving out Lady Stone Heart for example). Some I would have liked for them to keep closer to the book (Frey Pie for example).
But overall I think they've done a pretty good job hewing close to the books but not making the mistake of trying to do an impossible exact match with them.
However, I do think that they have made some missteps in execution which are kind of worrying for future seasons. For example, I don't mind them having Stannis on an arc to where he burns his daughter (and Selyse to where she tries to stop it) but for me it was done clunckily with sudden jarring reversals of character for both of them. Same with Allister Thorne with the whole letting he wildlings in and THEN deciding to kill Jon. If they wanted Thorne as part of the "For the Watch" scene, ok. But they just didn't execute it well in my opinion. Even the threat of the Sparrows and the Faith Militant wasn't done convincingly IMO.
And tons has been written and said about Dorne. I'm not sure what happened there. I'm guessing some time in the future we'l hear about a 2nd production unit or something that was not up to snuff.
But overall I think they've done a pretty good job hewing close to the books but not making the mistake of trying to do an impossible exact match with them.
However, I do think that they have made some missteps in execution which are kind of worrying for future seasons. For example, I don't mind them having Stannis on an arc to where he burns his daughter (and Selyse to where she tries to stop it) but for me it was done clunckily with sudden jarring reversals of character for both of them. Same with Allister Thorne with the whole letting he wildlings in and THEN deciding to kill Jon. If they wanted Thorne as part of the "For the Watch" scene, ok. But they just didn't execute it well in my opinion. Even the threat of the Sparrows and the Faith Militant wasn't done convincingly IMO.
And tons has been written and said about Dorne. I'm not sure what happened there. I'm guessing some time in the future we'l hear about a 2nd production unit or something that was not up to snuff.
Posted on 7/15/15 at 1:22 pm to Methuselah
Agree with a lot of that.
I would liked to see more on the discussions between the nights watch re: wildlings vs white walkers vs we're fricked. It just didn't make sense that they couldn't understand the situation to the point of killing snow over it. Discontent and grumbling, yes, but not mutiny. Are they that stupid or was snow that bad of a communicator that he couldn't convince them of the real danger?
I would liked to see more on the discussions between the nights watch re: wildlings vs white walkers vs we're fricked. It just didn't make sense that they couldn't understand the situation to the point of killing snow over it. Discontent and grumbling, yes, but not mutiny. Are they that stupid or was snow that bad of a communicator that he couldn't convince them of the real danger?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News