Started By
Message

re: Russia Unveils New Main Battle Tank, Among Other Things

Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:23 am to
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17237 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:23 am to
One thing that no one has mentioned here so far is:

Since WWII, the US has transitioned to a "service" economy rather than production/manufacturing base. We simply do not have as many factories we could convert to war production.

Would we be able to produce war materiel in enough quantities for a war that would surely outstrip the worst case supply scenarios?

America produced 300,000 aircraft in WWII. Do you think we'd be capable of producing 3,000 if we needed them within the first year?
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:26 am to
quote:

America produced 300,000 aircraft in WWII. Do you think we'd be capable of producing 3,000 if we needed them within the first year?


The giant is sleeping again. But this time, he is much fatter, lazier and will be much harder to wake up. And I question his terrible resolve nowadays too.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:29 am to
quote:

America produced 300,000 aircraft in WWII. Do you think we'd be capable of producing 3,000 if we needed them within the first year?


without question.
Posted by Vito Andolini
Member since Sep 2009
1879 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:42 am to
quote:

One thing that no one has mentioned here so far is:

Since WWII, the US has transitioned to a "service" economy rather than production/manufacturing base. We simply do not have as many factories we could convert to war production.

Would we be able to produce war materiel in enough quantities for a war that would surely outstrip the worst case supply scenarios?

America produced 300,000 aircraft in WWII. Do you think we'd be capable of producing 3,000 if we needed them within the first year?


An excellent question indeed. I doubt we could ever produce the vast amounts of war matériel that we did in the 1940's, but given the advance in technology, I doubt we would need to in order to cause an equal amount of death and destruction.

And of course, if we ever were ever about to lose a conventional war, we always have the nuclear option to fall back on, just as the Russian do, which is why going to war with them would be foolish on an epic/end of civilization scale.
Posted by just1dawg
Virginia
Member since Dec 2011
1486 posts
Posted on 5/6/15 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

America produced 300,000 aircraft in WWII. Do you think we'd be capable of producing 3,000 if we needed them within the first year?


Airplanes at the complexity level of WWII aircraft like the P-51 or B-17? Yes, definitely.

3000 JSF, Rafale, Gripens, etc in one year? No way. Nobody could do it because there isn't a demand for combat aircraft produced at anywhere near that rate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram