- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So...who's our receiving threats?
Posted on 5/1/15 at 11:25 pm to TIGERSby10
Posted on 5/1/15 at 11:25 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Tell that to Seattle.
- Seattle has a great defense which we don't have
- A better running back
- A QB who can keep plays alive long enough to let their crappy WRs get open
- Lost their last game because of their crappy receivers
- Just traded their 1st rder for our best receiving option
2
Posted on 5/1/15 at 11:38 pm to saintsfan22
What does Seattle's defense have to do with a discussion of receiving threats?
Lynch may be better than Ingram or Spiller but I would rather both than an aging Rb that is not content in Seattle.
Brees can keep plays alive as long as Wilson when he has a good O-line and now he does.
Seattle loss their last game because of their crappy coaching decision, not their WRs.
Seattle got our best WR but we got their best lineman. Moot point.
Lynch may be better than Ingram or Spiller but I would rather both than an aging Rb that is not content in Seattle.
Brees can keep plays alive as long as Wilson when he has a good O-line and now he does.
Seattle loss their last game because of their crappy coaching decision, not their WRs.
Seattle got our best WR but we got their best lineman. Moot point.
This post was edited on 5/1/15 at 11:41 pm
Posted on 5/2/15 at 1:24 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
saintsfan22
Then go be a Seattle fan?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News