Started By
Message

re: LSU's Danielle Hunter wows scouts with dazzling pro-day display

Posted on 3/31/15 at 1:59 am to
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 1:59 am to
I don't defend his lack of sack production at all. I even said he doesn't produce sacks.

I defend him when people say he wasn't productive or didn't make plays on the field for us or he wasnt any good, because that's complete bullshite. He produced in every category for us except sacks. And I said that. And the only thing I said about Dupree is that Hunter had more TFL this year than he did. That's it. Didn't compare them at all actually.

And I never said he was special or even great here for us.
Posted by Speys and Tays
Member since Dec 2014
340 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 2:52 am to
Is It a good thing that LSU is stacked with players that look great at the combine and not so much anywhere else? Hunter as a rush end had 1.5 sacks, that's the stat that counts. Does anyone ever recall how many tackles for loss Gastineau, Smith, and JJ Watt have, no. The recruiting of freakish athletes is ok, but only if a real football player is part of the package. Seems to be one more here with Hunter.
Too small for the DE in pros, never operating in space in college, not good.
Posted by Hooligan's Ghost
Member since Jul 2013
5212 posts
Posted on 3/31/15 at 7:06 am to
averaging more than one TFL per game is good at any level of football, sacks or not

in fact that is how defensive linemen are evaluated
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32457 posts
Posted on 4/1/15 at 9:04 am to
Chavis and his idiotic "schemes" probably cost Hunter about $2M in guaranteed money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram