- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your response when someone says Jesus would've been a liberal/socialist?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 11:06 am to Champagne
Posted on 3/20/15 at 11:06 am to Champagne
quote:
Yeah, dude, except for the MAIN PART of liberalism, Jesus would be a liberal!
That's some seriously bad logic.
?
Abortion is the "main part of liberalism"? Are you 12?
2
Posted on 3/20/15 at 11:12 am to Grim
quote:
Abortion is the "main part of liberalism"? Are you 12?
I know, right? Truth is, liberals and conservatives all want the same things. Peace of mind for themselves and their families, better infrastructure, less poor people, more money, peace, etc. They just disagree on the means of accomplishing these things, making the political side of this conversation a little meaningless. If taxes are the only way to meet these needs, then he'd either be for it or just have an impossible amount of work cut out for him.
Don't crucify me for this, but I don't find too many differences between the red team and blue team when it comes to their intentions.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 1:04 pm to Grim
quote:
Abortion is the "main part of liberalism"? Are you 12?
Abortion is a huge part of American Liberalism. The notion that Jesus would be a Liberal when Liberalism stands for Abortion is illogical.
You can't separate Abortion from Liberalism. They are a part of the same Dismal Tapestry.
The "Jesus Would be a Progressive Liberal" crowd are preaching illogical non-sense that can't stand any kind of analytical scrutiny.
He was a radical revolutionary for his time and place. It is certain that he did NOT preach abortion of the fetus.
It's also pretty clear that he would not subscribe to the legal basis for distinguishing abortion from murder, which is that the fetus is not a "person" under common law.
But, people are entitled to their opinions.
PS I am "Sheldon Cooper" 12.
This post was edited on 3/20/15 at 1:10 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News