- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marilyn vos Savant and the history of the Montel Hall question
Posted on 2/23/15 at 4:37 pm to link
Posted on 2/23/15 at 4:37 pm to link
quote:You switch again. You have a 99.9999% chance of winning if you switch.
no, a million cards flipped upside down. one of them is a million dollar grand prize. you can pick any card, then 999,998 incorrect cards are flipped over. you're given the choice to stay with your original 1-in-a-million chance or switch. remember, you're all jason's got, and he's depending on you.
Here is the formulation for any scenario from Wikipedia:
quote:
D. L. Ferguson (1975 in a letter to Selvin cited in (Selvin 1975b)) suggests an N-door generalization of the original problem in which the host opens p losing doors and then offers the player the opportunity to switch; in this variant switching wins with probability (N-1)/[N(N-p-1)]. If the host opens even a single door, the player is better off switching, but, if the host opens only one door, the advantage approaches zero as N grows large (Granberg 1996:188). At the other extreme, if the host opens all but one losing door the advantage increases as N grows large (the probability of winning by switching approaches 1 as N grows very large)
This post was edited on 2/23/15 at 4:51 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)