- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:56 pm to rintintin
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:56 pm to rintintin
quote:Mostly irrelevant, to be exact.
You are trying to make a very bold statement, that SB rings are meaningless
quote:Isn't that what I've said for 6 pages?
Maybe if you want to just say "this is why winning this SB is irrelevant in determining Brady's legacy", then you have a valid argument.
1
Posted on 2/1/15 at 10:00 pm to shel311
quote:
Isn't that what I've said for 6 pages?
Your thread title reads:
quote:
This is why Superbowl rings are mostly irrelevant
which is not true.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News