Started By
Message

re: 4-2-5 Scheme or Personnel far fetched ?

Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:30 pm to
Posted by NamariTiger
Flower Mound, Texas
Member since Jun 2014
17746 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:30 pm to
Yeah but TCU runs their's like 4-3 under scheme with a 2 robber and cloud coverage on opposite sides of the field.
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:55 pm to
Ok... Should have just said we should run TCUs D, and not just the 4-2-5

And while we have the CB and nickel to run it, Mills would struggle as the lone safety. Would rather him in 1 of the nickel spots and put Adams as the lone safety.

Plus, you sacrifice some beef up front which would come back to hurt us vs the run considering how we struggled agaianst it this year. You would be taking out a LB and have 2 DBs playing outside the tackle box. And it takes away from Debos strength, which is playing in space. . He would struggle, so would LL. Beckwith and Kwon could have done it though.

And at the same time, I don't see the need for it considering we were 1 of the best in the nation agaisnt the pass and have a lot of talented DBs. Patterson started running this D because he was struggling on the back end vs talented offenses. We have the DBs to matchup with anyone in the nation. Our big problem is stopping the run inside.

And we ran something similar to it in 2011 when we had Mo and Simon as the CBs with Ron Brooks and TM as the slot CBs. We just went man to man a lot because we had the players to do it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram