Started By
Message

re: Interstate Cable Barriers

Posted on 1/4/15 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
7699 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

They had a lot of people in those one in a million crashes in South Louisiana before these barriers. Think a car full of kids was one.


No doubt.

There is also a lot of people that struck cable barriers that were only a few feet from traffic that would have slowed and stayed in the available median runoff area.

My point is it is my opinion the benefit of the cable barrier may be offset by the safety hazard of loss of available runoff area. On the "near" side the runoff area is reduced to nothing.

I think a concrete barrier in the center would have been better.

And I'll take a bet that after 10 years of having to constantly rebuild these systems you'll see concrete barriers going up.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73775 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

think a concrete barrier in the center would have been better.


I will take a cable barrier over concrete everytime.

Concrete barriers are destroyed regularly and take a lot more time/money to rebuild. The barriers on I10 east are repaired suprisingly fast.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32248 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 1:08 pm to
Yeah, they are too close to the passing lanes on whatever side they are installed. Their proximity to traffic means that they spray debris all over the road during minor accidents which may not even have involved a crossover.

I think concrete or metal barriers may have been a better choice if mounted farther from the actual road. At least they still seem to work after minor glancing accidents.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram