Started By
Message

Chavis and the clause

Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:50 pm
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30663 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:50 pm
He was upset more about the "outgoing head coach Clause" than the money ..... Correct?



If so, was he foreshadowing that he sees the writing on the wall for miles and he didn't want to be standing after the music stops?
Posted by BhamBengal
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2012
2476 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:51 pm to
More like he wanted and felt like he deserves a retirement plan in his contract
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:52 pm to
Because Chavis would be undesirable if Miles is fired?

It was about the money
This post was edited on 1/1/15 at 1:53 pm
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
90088 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

If so, was he foreshadowing that he sees the writing on the wall for miles and he didn't want to be standing after the music stops?


Seems like it would go for any HC, not just Miles. He wanted guaranteed money if the coach was gone. He asked for the same at A&M...and got it. If Sumlin leaves, or gets fired, he still gets paid.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram