Started By
Message

re: Success on field compared to recruiting

Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:15 am to
Posted by Ppro
natchez
Member since Dec 2013
418 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:15 am to
over what timeframe is these rankings?
Posted by TDTGodfather
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6169 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

over what timeframe is these rankings?


sorry i edited this post, bc the on field results are from 2009 on but the recruiting results start in 05 i think. which i think is even worse for negatigers. No saban players in 09.

although Miles haters can hang on to the fact that this is thru 2013. so this season (2014/their favorite) is not in the results
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 10:23 am
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27889 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

over what timeframe is these rankings?

2005-09 recruiting and 2009-2013 performance.

I wonder how it hurts/helps that LSU has had the most underclassman go pro than other universities in skewing these results?
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 10:22 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram