Started By
Message

re: Officials say ULM won't be following UAB's football footsteps

Posted on 12/13/14 at 10:27 am to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 10:27 am to
Since ULM uses less tax money than the likes of Tech and ULL, I'd say that Tech and ULL should drop to FCS before ULM does. All things considered, ULM is mathematically a better football program than these other two leeches.
This post was edited on 12/13/14 at 10:33 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
22483 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Since ULM uses less tax money than the likes of Tech and ULL, I'd say that Tech and ULL should drop to FCS before ULM does.


Except if you took away the entire subsidy used by all 3 schools, ULL and Tech would still be able to maintain a larger annual budget than ULM.
Posted by Speys and Tays
Member since Dec 2014
340 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 2:19 am to
quote:

ballscaster
Since ULM uses less tax money than the likes of Tech and ULL, I'd say that Tech and ULL should drop to FCS before ULM does. All things considered, ULM is mathematically a better football program than these other two leeches.


This plus ULM is located in a more viable city and has more potential growth and drawing base. La. Tech should become part of Grambling whose history is much more important and worth saving.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram