Team A is 0-10 and has not set his lineup in three weeks, leaving bye players in and obviously gave up this year. Team B is 6-4 and in playoff contention.

Team A trades Jamal Charles for. Gore and Andrew Hawkins.

The league voted to veto the trade, team B is pissed and wants to know why we veto a fair trade

Where we wrong to veto the trade? What would you have done

Thanks I advance

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by BigOrangeWave

Member since Oct 2014

660 posts

Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:15 am to chipper4

Clearly an unfair trade, team A is tanking

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by DeathValley85

Member since May 2011

19006 posts

Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:16 am to chipper4

VETO

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TaderSalad

mudbug territory

Member since Jul 2014

26167 posts

Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:18 am to DeathValley85

Stopped reading at charles... veto

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by forksup

Member since Dec 2013

8817 posts

Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:21 am to chipper4

I hate when this happens. Team A had obviously given up, that's why.

My league had a guy in last place give away Ellington for McFadden + Harvin. He also gave away Jordy to the same guy for McFadden and Crabtree a week before. Basically, out of playoffs guy traded Jordy and Ellington for Harvin and Crabtree. And then in our group messaging system...

Jordy Ellington guy, "I like my team."

Harvin Crabtree guy, "I like your team too :)"

Really hope the Jordy Ellington guy loses one more game so he's out of playoffs too

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TaderSalad

mudbug territory

Member since Jul 2014

26167 posts

Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:36 am to forksup

I wish leagues would have a setting where you can lock out the bottom of the league guys from making trades/dropping/adding. Youve had 10 weeks to set your lineups and care, youre stuck with what you got. would prevent alot of collusion. Just how they lock in teams for playoffs, they should lock out bottom dwellers

Page 1