Started By
Message

re: Analysis on Alabama and Tom Ritter

Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Dont know where these lies perpetuated other than to fit an agenda but they are totally false.


Forgive my lack of desire not to type all this again, ut since it's continuing to be ignored, I'm just going to copy and paste my exact post on this.

quote:

Care to address the ones I mentioned above since you seem to want to quote SEC rules.

Why is it this rule is in place in the first place? Is it because the office inherently understands that having a connection to a university can or would potentially cause one to use their influence unduly? I think we can all agree it is.

Since that's the case...why no worry about Mark Womack as the CFO and third ranked executive within the SEC, and Steve Shaw (he of the aforementioned quote) being the head of officiating BOTH being alumni of Alabama? Are we to now pretend that an official in a game can effect things based on bias BUUUUUUT...the CFO and Head of Officiating are beyond such pettiness?



If the SEC gives the appearance of being concerned that someone with ties to a program could effect the outcome of games as an official, why no concern for that same problem when those folks are in executive positions where REAL influence could be wielded? The fact that this question has continued to go unanswered if fairly telling I think.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17883 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:17 pm to
It's bigger than being an alumni if he is an alumni, you guys will figure it out eventually and will shite yourselves.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 9:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram